"And he says she's just a friend..."
So after listening to the Russ Parr Morning Show this morning when they were allowing women to call in and talk about what they hate about men, one subject came up that I know all of us women and some men have dealt with at some point or another, if not several times: the issue of being referred to as "just a friend" when we know we are far more than that-- or even worse, inquiring about another girl/guy and getting the answer, "Oh, nothing's going on...we're just 'friends'" when you know damn well it's a lie.
I can take this posting in two different directions, with one direction discussing why we lie and cover up the truth about a relationship or situation with the word "friend", and the other one direction discussing why it's now become so acceptable nowadays to sleep with our friends in the first place. "Friends with benefits" is what we call them, but is it really a benefit to allow someone to downplay the reality of what's really going on-- to downplay the fact that here we are, sharing our bodies with one other in an act that some consider sacred and willing to wait until marriage for? Some people don't mind it. Some people are able to make an "agreement" and keep things at a completely physical level that involves no emotion, thus making it that much easier to pull that "friend" card and go on with their day. But for others who can't handle that type of agreement, sharing that type of "friendship" is much more. You feel as though you should share a special emotional connection that no one else has with that person. You feel as though they should be with you and only you-- but if that's the case...if we feel as though we can make these demands for monogamy from our "friends", why aren't we putting just as much energy into demanding a committed relationship from them? Why are sitting back and opening the door for the drama and acceptance of having multiple partners (which only multiplies the chance of being infected with an STD)? Shoot, I feel as though we're starting to misuse the term "friend" just as much as we misuse the term "love".
By allowing someone to refer to you as just a "friend", you're allowing them to have their cake and eat it too. You are giving them the opportunity to disregard your feelings, walk all over you, and switch up the way that they act toward you at any given moment. Furthermore, you are only setting yourself up for a losing argument if feelings become an issue in the future, because the other person will always be able to say that you two were "only friends" in the first place. I truly feel for those who aren't aware that they are being referred to as only a "friend", and some aren't aware of it. Some think that they've found this great person who is completely into them and who are going to give them the relationship they've always wanted...but in the other person's mind, nope, sorry honey. You're just a friend.
Now more than ever I am picky about who I call a friend and what makes them so (whether male or female). As mentioned in the book, He's Just Not That Into You, I personally prefer the types of friends that don't make question what our status is, or make me cry myself to sleep. I've unfortunately allowed too many "friends with benefits" in my life, and although I have been stupid enough to let it keep happening (and am still trying to learn to demand more and accept no less), I also know I would much rather be committed to someone than to give them the option of ending up with someone else and referring to me as "just a friend". At that point I'm thinking, no, I'm more than a friend. I've shared emotionally and physically intimate moments with you, and unless this is how you interact with ALL of your friends (male or female), then you need to give me a little more acknowledgement than that. We are NOT "just friends". One girl on the radio made me laugh out loud this morning when she said, "If we're sleeping together, we ARE going together-- you just don't know it yet." LMAO.
Which brings me to the next point...when we are involved with someone and see them having constant interaction with another person that they consider "just a friend", at what point do we stop and question whether it's really the truth? I've been on both sides of this situation before-- I've been called "the friend", and I've referred to someone as just "a friend" when they were in fact more than that. I remember hearing about a particular situation where a guy had two female "friends" who didn't know of each other, other than the fact that they were both "friends" to him. Turns out he was having sex with them both...but they didn't know that, because they were both too busy believing that the other girl was "just his friend". Ha-- "friends with benefits", yet he was the only one benefitting. The other two were just getting played and setting their feelings up to get hurt. So when is it safe to ask the person we're with just what kind of "friendship" they are sharing with that person? Of course if we are in a committed relationship with that person, we want to trust them and allow them to have friends. But for those of us who are "only friends" to the person we're involved with, we may feel as though we have no place to ask about another "friend". This is yet another disadvantage to allowing ourselves to be "just friends"-- we have no questioning rights!
The fact of the matter is, friends don't sleep with each other. If you (and this goes for me too) even think that someone you're involved with is more than just friends with one of their friends of the opposite sex, then you need to pull that card and ask, because "friend" seems to be the new excuse these days for getting what we want from whomever we want. If you're sleeping with one of your "friends", you need to reevaluate what's really going on, what you really want from them, and ask yourself how much longer you want to allow yourself to be disrespected-- because whether or not you realize it or want to admit to it, if he or she is not moving in the direction of pursuing a real, committed relationship with you, you're only disrespecting your own body and heart.
I can take this posting in two different directions, with one direction discussing why we lie and cover up the truth about a relationship or situation with the word "friend", and the other one direction discussing why it's now become so acceptable nowadays to sleep with our friends in the first place. "Friends with benefits" is what we call them, but is it really a benefit to allow someone to downplay the reality of what's really going on-- to downplay the fact that here we are, sharing our bodies with one other in an act that some consider sacred and willing to wait until marriage for? Some people don't mind it. Some people are able to make an "agreement" and keep things at a completely physical level that involves no emotion, thus making it that much easier to pull that "friend" card and go on with their day. But for others who can't handle that type of agreement, sharing that type of "friendship" is much more. You feel as though you should share a special emotional connection that no one else has with that person. You feel as though they should be with you and only you-- but if that's the case...if we feel as though we can make these demands for monogamy from our "friends", why aren't we putting just as much energy into demanding a committed relationship from them? Why are sitting back and opening the door for the drama and acceptance of having multiple partners (which only multiplies the chance of being infected with an STD)? Shoot, I feel as though we're starting to misuse the term "friend" just as much as we misuse the term "love".
By allowing someone to refer to you as just a "friend", you're allowing them to have their cake and eat it too. You are giving them the opportunity to disregard your feelings, walk all over you, and switch up the way that they act toward you at any given moment. Furthermore, you are only setting yourself up for a losing argument if feelings become an issue in the future, because the other person will always be able to say that you two were "only friends" in the first place. I truly feel for those who aren't aware that they are being referred to as only a "friend", and some aren't aware of it. Some think that they've found this great person who is completely into them and who are going to give them the relationship they've always wanted...but in the other person's mind, nope, sorry honey. You're just a friend.
Now more than ever I am picky about who I call a friend and what makes them so (whether male or female). As mentioned in the book, He's Just Not That Into You, I personally prefer the types of friends that don't make question what our status is, or make me cry myself to sleep. I've unfortunately allowed too many "friends with benefits" in my life, and although I have been stupid enough to let it keep happening (and am still trying to learn to demand more and accept no less), I also know I would much rather be committed to someone than to give them the option of ending up with someone else and referring to me as "just a friend". At that point I'm thinking, no, I'm more than a friend. I've shared emotionally and physically intimate moments with you, and unless this is how you interact with ALL of your friends (male or female), then you need to give me a little more acknowledgement than that. We are NOT "just friends". One girl on the radio made me laugh out loud this morning when she said, "If we're sleeping together, we ARE going together-- you just don't know it yet." LMAO.
Which brings me to the next point...when we are involved with someone and see them having constant interaction with another person that they consider "just a friend", at what point do we stop and question whether it's really the truth? I've been on both sides of this situation before-- I've been called "the friend", and I've referred to someone as just "a friend" when they were in fact more than that. I remember hearing about a particular situation where a guy had two female "friends" who didn't know of each other, other than the fact that they were both "friends" to him. Turns out he was having sex with them both...but they didn't know that, because they were both too busy believing that the other girl was "just his friend". Ha-- "friends with benefits", yet he was the only one benefitting. The other two were just getting played and setting their feelings up to get hurt. So when is it safe to ask the person we're with just what kind of "friendship" they are sharing with that person? Of course if we are in a committed relationship with that person, we want to trust them and allow them to have friends. But for those of us who are "only friends" to the person we're involved with, we may feel as though we have no place to ask about another "friend". This is yet another disadvantage to allowing ourselves to be "just friends"-- we have no questioning rights!
The fact of the matter is, friends don't sleep with each other. If you (and this goes for me too) even think that someone you're involved with is more than just friends with one of their friends of the opposite sex, then you need to pull that card and ask, because "friend" seems to be the new excuse these days for getting what we want from whomever we want. If you're sleeping with one of your "friends", you need to reevaluate what's really going on, what you really want from them, and ask yourself how much longer you want to allow yourself to be disrespected-- because whether or not you realize it or want to admit to it, if he or she is not moving in the direction of pursuing a real, committed relationship with you, you're only disrespecting your own body and heart.

